The language that lawmakers, public officials, and opinion leaders use to describe their work is as important as the content of their message. Vocabulary and tone can either contradict or verify intentions, goals, and motives. This is especially true in diplomatic and international issues, particularly in discussions about the relationship with the People’s Republic of China (PRC).

This memo explains the important distinctions between references to China and the Chinese people, the PRC, and the Communist Party of China (CCP). It outlines specific categories of language that are dangerous, problematic, or unproductive, including examples of these categories. It also explains how historical context embedded in messaging can affect perception
or receptivity. It is intended to provide a framework for assessing the language that officials and their staff use in public communications.